Expert advice service for in silico toxicology

Computational toxicology is a rapidly developing discipline increasingly being adopted and encouraged by regulators. It offers lower cost and time compared to in vitro and in vivo methods

Keeping up to date is resources and time consuming ...

​

 flyer 

In Silico Data for Hazard and Safety Assessment 
of Cosmetic Ingredients

Animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients and products has been completely banned in the EU. Consequently the safety assessment of cosmetics requires new methods ...

​

 flyer 

In silico assessment of mutagenicity for E&L and medical devices

Computational toxicology is applied to predict skin sensitisation and  bacterial
in vitro reverse mutagenicity (Ames test) using a combination of rules-based SAR, statistical QSAR and an expert judgement.

​

flyer

(Q)SAR and read-across service

ToxNavigation is specialised in the application of QSAR and read-across for internal and regulatory purposes. Choosing the best analogues, assessing uncertainty, building a case using weight of evidence, applying the best QSAR models and assembling a report with justifications are all part of this comprehensive service.

​

 flyer 

Non-testing methods for Dietary Risk Assessment of Plant Protection Products and their Residues

The Guidance on the establishment of the residue definition for dietary risk assessment adopted by EFSA in 2016  describes a stepwise approach based on toxicological, metabolism and non-testing data ((Q)SAR, read-across and TTC ) ...

 flyer 

In silico assessment of mutagenicity for drug impurities under ICH M7

Computational toxicology is applied to predict bacterial in vitro reverse mutagenicity (Ames test) under the ICH M7 regulations using a combination of rules-based SAR, statistical QSAR and an expert judgement.

​

flyer

Endocrine disruption screening service

Screening for endocrine disruptors early in your development cycle can save you considerable costs. The service provides a cost effective QSAR screen applying 153 different models covering 18 receptors to your compound, mixture or UVCB.  An expert analysis is provided along with a detailed report.

​

 flyer 

Alternatives to testing on animals for the REACH Regulation
(Q)SAR, grouping and read-acros

ECHA says “… We want to encourage registrants to use alternative methods in the best possible way ... The registrants should consider their registration dossiers as “living documents” and regularly update them ” ...

 flyer